substack
Good Thoughts
The philosopher Richard Yetter Chappell argues for consequentialism one tight argument at a time. Recent posts turn the Euthyphro dilemma on God's nature, defend fallibilism over moral 'cluelessness', explain why you can't dismiss effective altruism wholesale, and name the 'schmotte-and-bailey' fallacy along the way. It is rigorous without journal prose, and Chappell is unusually willing to say where his own view leads somewhere uncomfortable.




